Mon 19 Jul 2010
Commentary: Hart School Board needs to cut ties with SCV Facilities Foundation
Posted by admin under Castaic , Dave Bossert , Local , Opinion , Santa Clarita Valley , Schools [3] Comments
This past week the William S. Hart School Board finally made a decision by choosing the Romero Canyon property to build the proposed new Castaic High School. This puts to rest the long drawn-out political jockeying over where to site the new school and actually gives hope to all parents in the Hart School district that the Castaic High School will open its doors for the 2013-2014 school year.
Now it is time for the Hart School Board to turn its attention to cutting ties with the Santa Clarita Valley Facilities Foundation. It is the SCV Facilities Foundation that purchased the Hasley/Sloan property which has proved not to be a suitable suit for the proposed Castaic High School.
For those unfamiliar with the foundation here is what the their website claims; “The Santa Clarita Valley Facilities Foundation is dedicated to locating, acquiring and developing sites for new schools in the William S. Hart Union High School District. Since 1998, the Facilities Foundation has continued to make great progress toward fulfilling its mission to assist the Hart District in providing school facilities through land acquisition and infrastructure development.”
I would argue that locating, acquiring and developing sites for new schools is the responsibility of the William S. Hart Union High School District elected board members and the District staff. The vast majority of school districts across this great nation handle their own locating, acquiring and developing of sites for new schools which is a much more transparent process.
For years now there have been comments, rumors and questions being raised about the Facilities Foundation and who is actually benefitting from that organization. Essentially there are more questions then there are answers as to why there is a separate organization making land deals on behalf of the Hart School district.
The local school district tax payers also need to question some of the choices that are being made and whether there are any questionable dealings going on with some of these land acquisitions. Just take a look at this biology diagram prepared by Padre for the Hasley/Sloan property:
![]()
Notice the endangered Slender Mariposa Lily locations; the Coastal Sage Scrub areas and Western Spadefoot Toad habitats. After this biology report was completed there have been reports that local live stock were apparently allowed to graze on this property.
Now take a look at this grading diagram by Lund the Civil Engineers which was completed after the biology report:
![]()
Is it me or does it strike you as well that there doesn’t seem to be any indication that the endangered habitats ever existed? There is no indication on this grading plan that any of the habitats are untouched or are being graded around or mitigated in any way.
The SCV Facilities Foundation also has several hundred acres of land known as the Sierra/Vasquez property. Apparently they are in the process of getting a $7 million dollar grant to put in road infrastructure which would be required for a school. Why so much? Because the infrastructure requirements seem to be expanded as the foundation is apparently planning on developing some home sites on a portion of this parcel of land.
If the Hart School District is suppose to caring for our children’s education then they need to be 100% focused on that and not spending time engaging in land speculation, some of which will be developed into housing tracts, with a third party facilities foundation. It’s a school district not a real estate development group. The Hart School District should be using all the tax dollars from measures “V” and “SA” for schools and school facilities only.
Since the choice of Romero Canyon has been made, the William S. Hart School Board needs to now direct the SCV Facilities Foundation to sell the poorly conceived and environmentally challenged Hasley/Sloan property. The property was bought with monies borrowed from the Hart General Fund so the proceeds for the Hasley/Sloan sale should be returned to that fund. Regardless if the sale is at a loss because the property was purchased at the height of the real estate bubble. The Hart District General Fund money should be used for General Fund purposes not land speculation.
The Hart School Board members need to work diligently towards complete transparency in how they operate. They must sever whatever relationship they have with the SCV Facilities Foundation; cut all financial ties with that foundation even if it is at a lose; and take care of the districts business themselves. This includes not having Hart School Board members on the SCV Facilities Foundation Board which gives the appearance of a complete conflict of interest.
There is no need for a facilities foundation especially since the responsible developers in the Santa Clarita Valley are building schools in a timely fashion going forward. Plans are already on the drawing boards for the appropriate schools to be built out as new homes are added to the area.
The Hart School Board has made a great leap in rebuilding their credibility and their reputation this past week with choosing the Romero Canyon site for the new Castaic High School. Now they need to continue on that course and jettison the SCV Facilities Foundation relationship.
Dave Bossert- Commentary
Dave Bossert is a community volunteer who serves on a number of boards and councils. His commentaries represent his own opinions and not necessarily the views of any organization he may be affiliated with or those of the West Ranch Beacon.






July 19th, 2010 at 8:38 am
[...] Dave Bossert, fresh of his yearly Maine sabbatical, says the Hart District ought to sever its ties with the once-controversial and always murky SCV Facilities Foundation, the non-profit land-acquisition arm the District once depended on to find and purchase new school sites WRB [...]
July 19th, 2010 at 12:27 pm
Excellent, Dave! The Hart District School Board made the best decision opting for the Romero Canyon site.
July 19th, 2010 at 6:46 pm
There is an error in your column. The Facilities Foundation did not purchase the Hasley/Sloan property at the height of the Real Estate Bubble; this property was purchased by the Foundation in 2002.
It is important to note, however, that even though the real estate prices had yet to escalate in 2002, the Foundation paid a hefty premium for this property– far and above its market value at the time. Those who live in Hasley Canyon always wondered why the Foundation overpaid for this property and the fact that the former owner was a personal friend of Mr. Patterson’s certainly entered into the speculation.
Another important point is that when the Foundation contracted to purchase the property, not a single Castaic resident, politician, community leader or business leader knew of the planned purchase. In other words, Mr. Rick Patterson and the Facilities Foundation sought to determine the location of Castaic’s high school without any input from the elected Hart Board members or any community members. Can you imagine that happening in Valencia? Truly scandalous.
You are absolutely right that the Hart Board has gained a lot of credibility by taking the action they did in selecting Romero. And they need to take it to the next step in getting rid of the Foundation, just as you say.
It was very curious to see Mr. John Calvert speaking on behalf of the Foundation at the July 15 meeting. Mr. Calvert is currently a consultant for the Foundation. Until recently, he owned the property right across the street from the Hasley/Sloan site; many people feel that he still has a business interest in that property. Regardless, his involvement in the Hasley/Sloan site selection process has the perception of influence-peddling. Additionally, Mr. Calvert has purchased property in Castaic which he has subsequently allowed to go into foreclosure. On one of these properties, the former owner had held a second mortgage. Mr. Calvert’s unethical dealings in not handling his financial obligations has cost the former owner dearly. This is the type of person that the Foundation has working for it. Even more reason to get rid of the Foundation.