Sun 4 Apr 2010
Gauny and Boydston hold press conference on Creekside
Posted by admin under City of Santa Clarita , elections , Politics , Santa Clarita Valley [4] Comments
(First posted at 3:22 PM on April 3,2010) On Saturday, April 03, 2010, Santa Clarita City Council candidates David Gauny and TinBen Boydston held a rather impromptu press conference in front of The Signal headquarters on Creekside Drive. The purpose of the press conference was to point out the blatant and potentially disingenuous way that the City Council incumbents are being supported by a Los Angeles based Political Action Committee (PAC) and the fact that the newspaper has refused to cover the story.
In fact, it was obvious to many that the local so-called newspaper of record has been sidestepping any story that could have a negative effect on the incumbents. The Signal appears to report biased versions favoring the incumbents only after it has been widely reported by the local electronic media. The candidates not only acknowledged this but thanked The Beacon and SCVTalk for getting both sides of the stories out to the public.
Both Gauny and Boyston want to see The Signal investigate and report on “Citizens for Integrity in
Government 2010” which is based at 8687 Melrose Avenue, 7th Floor in Los Angeles and is the entity behind at least five mailers supporting the incumbents. They both pointed out that to date The Signal would not cover this story so they decided to hold the press conference in front of the papers aging headquarters to spotlight this fact and apply pressure to the newspaper to report actual news and not make up stories out of thin-air or base them on rumors.
Citizens for Integrity in Government 2010 a appears to be run by Armando Azarloza who also spearheaded the independent expenditures supporting the Laurie Ender in her run for the City Council. Mr. Azarloza is the former campaign manager for Councilman Frank Ferry.
In documents handed out by Boydston and Gauny at the press conference, which included the state Form 460 campaign disclosure statements, Citizens for Integrity in Government 2010 received a $20,000 contribution from Beverly Hills based G&L Realty. You may recall that G&L Realty is the developer involved with the commercial office space expansion at the site of Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital.
On schedule D of the form, summary of expenditures, $13,133.91 of the $20,000 is being divided equally to support the incumbent candidates; Ferry, Weste and McLean. That breaks down to $4377.97 towards the re-election of each of the incumbents. Since the three are running as a block the entire $13,133.91 was spent on phone banks, polling and survey research, and campaign literature and mailings for all three incumbents together.
Now, the incumbents are not supposed to be aware of any of these independent expenditures nor who is funding, creating and mailing them. Yet it is clearly stated on the forms that Armando Azarloza, Councilman Frank Ferry’s former campaign manager, is running Citizens for Integrity in Government 2010. That would certainly appear to test the limits of City voters’ gullibility as to whether or not Ferry, at the very least, is aware of these activities.
The question now is whether The Signal will cover this story and just how will they spin it in favor of the incumbents whom they support? We’ll have more on this in the coming days!!
The Following are bullet-points used at the press conference by David Gauny:
History of G&L Realty
- Four years exposing the facts of the G&L expansion plan at Henry Mayo’s campus
- Facts are this:
- No commitment to build an expanded hospital
- Closure of our TCU for Seniors
- Delayed talk of a Regional Medical Center for a decade
- G&L –and their lobbyists— did a very good job of confusing these facts for our public: they called it a NIMBY issue.
- When this failed, they used a PAC –Cit for Integrity in Govt- to pump $29,500 to buy candidate Laurie Ender’s seat in our 2008 CC campaign.
- Rub: Residents were unable to identify who funded her election because the CIG failed to file within the city as required by FPPC rules – this was illegal.
- FPPC rules state that pre-election filings from PACs must be made with local election office where the expenditure is made.
- In 2010, between 2/27 thru 3/27: G&L has contributed $20,000 to the incumbents.
- Refused to file locally: TBB drove to Downey
- They also claim that only 13K was spent:
- Roughly 2,000 on polling and robo-calls
- $12,000 spent on FIVE mailings
- [SHOW MAIL] – This amount is highly questionable.
- My belief is that you will see a MUCH higher spending amount – long AFTER this election – THIS IS WRONG!
- To put things in perspective, as a challenger, I raised roughly $8,000 in this reporting period through hard work and lots of small checks – nothing more than $360, lots were under $100
- To date, I’ve raised roughly $25,000 and put in $15,000 of my own money as a personal loan to my campaign.
- Yet the incumbents received $20,000 from one company that does not even reside in our city!
- A single company –G&L Realty- has now substantially bankrolled four of our five City Council members
- Our public needs to know that this is happening
- Our public needs to ask why they are hiding their reports from the legal requirement placed on ALL candidates
- Our public needs to rid ourselves of incumbents –who are running as a voting bloc for the sole purpose of being financed by such an ourtside interest.
- Make no mistake: this is precisely how so many other cities have given way to LA’s urban sprawl: outside companies first buy the elections, then the vote and ultimately our future.
- Close: The only guaranteed benefit to our people in the city’s contract with G&L was a paltry $250,000 check toward a new Transitional Care Unit. We all know this would by nothing.
- G&L could have used their $20,000 to help our seniors – instead they chose to buy our elections so they wouldn’t have to give anyone here another dime.
- If I am elected, I will fight to put every curb and every control in place to limit PAC contributions and to maximize transparency in our local elections
- In my view, this is a virtual fraud on our electorate – it is a manipulation of the will of our people.






April 3rd, 2010 at 8:09 pm
What is very sad is that back when the big fight against the Cemex Mine was going on, our three incumbent council members thought Scott Wilk, as an employee of Buck McKeon, was a total dirt bag in the pockets of Cemex, and that Armando Azarloza was one of the dirtiest election campaign crooks operating in this part of Los Angeles County.
How times have changed.
Wilk running their campaigns and Azarloza running the P.R. operation.
I guess the desire to be re-elected trumps the desire to associate with honorable people.
April 4th, 2010 at 8:32 am
The problem with David Gauny is he will travel with anyone to help his political ambitions. His only elected office was a local HOA board to which he brought two people who he worked with in opposing the hospital. The board fell apart after David and his team were elected. Ultimately one of those two was recalled. Those two have almost destroyed that community and the one that was recalled is now threatening a lawsuit (sound familiar?). David now travels with the worst anti-immigrant crowd who don’t live in our city largely to get his name in the paper. He’s a smooth talker and campaigner but he’s not ready to actually lead anything.
April 4th, 2010 at 10:20 am
BillyBoy,
Your post is misleading. It is true that I served on our HOA. It is also true that the year after my election (we have staggered elections with two-year terms), three seats were open and three people ran: one incumbent and two challengers. I never brought anybody to anything – there were simply no other challengers so all were elected.
It is also true that serious friction occurred on the board after this election and one board member was recalled six months later and two resigned – almost entirely over an issue that has brewed in our HOA for more than 15 years.
Despite making every effort to ensure a fair recall vote, including the hiring of an independent elections firm, the recalled member challenged the recall in small claims court – they lost last month. Aside from legal costs, no money was paid out by the HOA.
Aside from that episode, I worked very well with our board to bring our HOA from 17% funded reserves to over-funding during my two-year tenure. Deferred maintenance was completed and dues were dropped to pre-2006 levels prior to my departure.
Your seeming authority is lost when you leave out key facts. As for my position on illegal immigration, it is just that: MY position. This could have gone the wrong way for me but it is a position that many seem to support.
I’m unclear on how you suggest that I did this for political points – I was the only challenger to support Kellar because I believe he is raising the right questions about this issue. That’s all.
April 5th, 2010 at 1:14 pm
Billy Boy:
No matter what you say about David Gauny or any of his current and prior friends, the clear purpose of your post is to obscure the facts with trivia.
The fact remains that G&L Realty is the largest if not only contributor to Armando Azarloza’s independent expenditure campaign committee, which did not file its FPPC required campaign statement on time, where they were supposed to be filed, with the Santa Clarita City Clerk. All of the committee’s money went to the 3 incumbents.
The fact remains that the California and Nevada Secretary of State’s offices public records show that G&L Realty is run by three people who no longer have any business trying to influence Santa Clarita’s elections. They have their Development Agreement signed, sealed and delivered, with deal terms which violated the Santa Clarita City Council’s fiduciary duty to the residents of the City, let alone violated common sense business principles which any Santa Clarita deal maker worth his salt would have negotiated on behalf of the City.
The very deal terms of the G&L Development Agreement, outlined by the West Ranch Beacon story, above, make it appear that G&L purchased that sweet deal on an installment basis. If one listens to the publicly released wiretap tapes of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, it is clear that the standard operating procedure, in terms of buying political favors is “pay a little now, get the deal signed, pay more after the deal is done”.
By the way, the names and addresses of the 3 people who are the managers of G&L Realty, are posed, in detail, on a Signal comment today:
DANIEL M GOTTLIEB
439 N BEDFORD DRIVE
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210
STEVEN D. LEBOWITZ
439 N BEDFORD DRIVE
BEVERLY HILLS CA 90210
S. CRAIG TOMPKINS
500 CITADEL DRIVE, SUITE 300
COMMERCE, CA 90040
It sure would be interesting for someone who supports Boydston or Gauny to run those names through the L.A. County Registrar of Voters public records. I bet none of them live in the City of Santa Clarita.
For the last 10 years or more, Santa Claritans who have been sick of politicial corruption have gone to the “Public Integrity Section” of the L.A. County District Attorney and the U.S. Attorney, asking that many questionable deals in Santa Clarita be investigated…like the most recent one where a certain Foundation member supposedly got $2Million from a well known land owner for the Foundation member lobbying for a school district to choose a particular school site. Unfortunately, both the DA and the US Attorney have had no interest in prosecuting any “crooked politicians” other than blacks, Latinos and an obscure white Democrat….meaning that real estate wheeler-dealers know they are safe in operating at the edges of the law in white Republican-majority suburbs.
It is hard to prove the sort of quid-pro-quo that the situation with the Council incumbents, G&L Realty and Armando Azarloza’s independent expenditure committee implies. However, there is an old Latin term which is apt: “Res ipsa loquitur”.