Mon 1 Oct 2007
Alarmed at the possibility that the Republican Party might pick Rudolph W. Giuliani as its presidential nominee despite his support for abortion rights, a coalition of influential Christian conservatives is threatening to back a third-party candidate reports the New York Times.
Â
The threat emerged from a group that broke away for separate discussions at a meeting Saturday in Salt Lake City of the Council for National Policy, a secretive conservative networking group. Participants said the smaller group included James C. Dobson of Focus on the Family, who is perhaps its most influential member; Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council; Richard A. Viguerie, the direct-mail pioneer; and dozens of other politically oriented conservative Christians.
Â
Almost everyone present at the smaller group’s meeting expressed support for a written resolution stating that “if the Republican Party nominates a pro-abortion candidate we will consider running a third-party candidate,†participants said.
Â
The participants said that the group chose the qualified term “consider†because it had not yet identified an alternative candidate, but that it was largely united in its plans to bolt the party if Mr. Giuliani, the former New York mayor, became the nominee. The participants spoke on condition of anonymity because the Council for National Policy meeting and the smaller meeting were secret, but they said members of the smaller group intended to publicize the resolution.
Â
Read it here: Third Party Threat






October 2nd, 2007 at 3:22 pm
It sounds like these good boys would like a presidential candidate more rhetorically against abortion, like Ronald Reagan who appointed Sandra Day O’Conner to the Supreme Court and George H.W. Bush who appointed David Sauter. Giuliani is actually a lawyer where Reagan and Bush Sr. — great men that they were — really didn’t understand law as well as any average attorney. At least Giuliani in his website explains why the models for the people he would appoint to the Supreme Court are Roberts, Alito and Scalia. These are all strict champions of precise law sharing a legalistic belief that killings cannot be allowed in any venue where it can only be guessed that the one killed is or isn’t an innocent human. That sounds better to me than minor leaguers in Salt Lake City trying show their clout against Giuliani so Hillary can be elected.